Authentication

Authenticating the Special Operations Manual By Dr. Robert M. Wood Introduction and Background “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” These words by Arthur C. Clark reflect what I believe: there is no magic. There are secrets, but they are the secrets of science and technology. During my professional career, I had been hungering […]

Fundamentally the basic discriminates for determining the likelihood of official government psywar and propaganda effort around SOM1-01 fail. Ask yourself these questions: Are the risks low and the trade-offs worthwhile? No. If the documents are to be believed, they would engender extraordinary espionage against an extraordinary target like Area 51 or inside the CIA or NSA a

What Does a Real Psychological Operations Officer Say About The Majestic Documents? Dr. Michael Aquino (Colonel, U.S. Army – Ret.), who spent his entire 24-year career both creating and managing enemy deception in psychological operations and propaganda, had this to say after studying SOM 1-01 and the Majestic documents: “I don’t see the MJ-12 documents

Psychological Warfare & The Majestic Documents: Little Evidence of Deception By Ryan S. Wood The possibility, however remote, needs to be considered that the professional hands of psychological warfare and propaganda experts are or were involved with the Majestic documents and the Special Operations Manual. Be it modern day covert planning and leaking or old psychological

Why the critics are wrong about SOM1-01  By Dr. Bob and Ryan Wood Recoveries of crashed UFOs permitted us Earthlings to begin the process of “reverse engineering” to figure out how the UFO craft might work. This process may have been started by the Germans in the 1930s, but in the U.S. it surely began

The Special Operations Manual SOM 1-01 was mailed from LaCrosse Wisconsin to Don Berliner, an author and UFO researcher, in 1994 in the form of undeveloped 35 mm film. Upon development, it turned out to be a manual entitled “Extraterrestrial Entities and Technologies – Recovery and Disposal” dated April 1994. Clearly the purpose was to